Lessons from the Pros

Featured Article

A Tip to Increase Your Winning Percentage

Much of the time, the trading articles I write are focused on where to enter a position more than any other topic. This is because it’s the most important part of the trade. If you can’t get your entry correct, meaning low-risk, high-reward, and high probability, the other components of your trade, such as the exit and management, will not work. Today, I want to focus on a simple yet powerful technique related to how you exit positions that should help you increase your winning percentage. To explain this, let’s look at a recent trade from our Mastermind Community Supply/Demand grid.

Profit Zone

In short, your profit zone is the distance from your entry to your target. So, in the example below, the profit zone is the distance from the short entry (supply) to the demand level below which would be our target. The blue line on the chart is the origin of the rally (demand) that brought price up to supply for our short entry. Many would take that demand area as their target, thinking, sell short at supply and buy back for a profit at demand.

NASDAQ 8/21/13 


Profitable Thinking

Demand as we know is a price level where there is competition to buy. So, if we buy where others are looking to buy, we are going to have to compete with them at that level which makes getting filled difficult. So, if we know there is competition to buy at demand, that is the last place we want to buy. If we want a much easier time getting our buy order filled, we need to buy before price reaches the area of demand. Instead of buying back our position at the blue line (demand area), buying back at the red line will give us a much easier and better chance at getting filled. Another way to say this… Instead of buying when there is competition to buy, buy back for your profit when there is still competition to sell. In this example, don’t get too caught up in the chart as this is not the best example, focus instead on the concept.

The Tip

So far, if you have been reading my articles for a while, nothing I have said so far is brand new information so let’s get to that now. For all our short term and long term trading opportunities, one component that must be present is an ideal/risk reward. No matter how many Odds Enhancers are present, the risk/reward must be there. To help define this for the purposes of this article, when we say 3:1, we mean risking 1 to potentially make 3. Furthermore, the “1” is the distance from entry to your protective stop and the “3” is the distance from your supply/demand level to the nearest opposing supply/demand level. However, given the information we discussed above on competition and how it relates to the probability of getting filled, we have an opportunity to increase our odds of a profitable trade.

  • If you are looking for trading opportunities that offer you 3:1, make sure the chart is offering you at least 4:1. If you are looking for 4:1, make sure the chart is offering you at least 5:1 and so on. If you want to increase your winning percentage even more, try this… If you are looking for 3:1, make sure the chart is offering 5:1.

I employ this concept on almost every trading opportunity I find and take. Most people who find 3:1 on a chart, set there trade up to take action at 3:1, I don’t. Instead, I would make sure the chart was offering at least 4:1 and then take profit at 3:1.

Of course, to do this objectively, you must be able to qualify and quantify real demand and supply in any and all markets with a very high degree of accuracy. All the information you need to do this in clearly seen on a price chart if you know what you’re looking for.

Hope this was helpful, have a great day.

Sam Seiden


DISCLAIMER This newsletter is written for educational purposes only. By no means do any of its contents recommend, advocate or urge the buying, selling or holding of any financial instrument whatsoever. Trading and Investing involves high levels of risk. The author expresses personal opinions and will not assume any responsibility whatsoever for the actions of the reader. The author may or may not have positions in Financial Instruments discussed in this newsletter. Future results can be dramatically different from the opinions expressed herein. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Reprints allowed for private reading only, for all else, please obtain permission.