|
Read and Grow Rich
Greetings from Acapulco! It's cloudy, wet, and humid, not exactly great beach weather, but it's a perfect time to follow up on last week's article and answer a great question from a reader. Keep those questions coming!
In last week's article, titled "Deadly Hurricanes and Dangerous Assumptions", we discussed at length the reasoning behind shorting the Great Britain Pound and going long the Japanese Yen (GBP/JPY). The idea was to short the weakling of the group (GBP, which has been falling relentlessly) and go long the Japanese Yen, which is the only currency other than the U.S. Dollar that has been performing well recently. Please note that when that article was written on September 1 (published on September 2), the GBP/JPY pair was trading at a major support level, at about 195.50, as indicated on the Figure 3 chart from last week's article. Also indicated was a potential catalyst for a break of that support level, in the final sentence, "The Japanese Yen tends to perform well when equities markets perform poorly, so if recent stock market weakness persists, look out below."
Look out below, indeed. Now it is Friday, September 5. Take a look at the "Last" price on the weekly chart, and I guess it's safe to say that support has broken. The last price just under 188.00 indicates a gain of about 750 pips this week. The low price of 186.01 indicates that at one point, the weekly gain was about 950 pips. It's time to ring the register. Hey, it beats working for a living! (See figure 1).
Figure 1: Weekly GBP/JPY chart breaks to new low; 9/01/2008 refers to the week. Source: Saxo Bank
I've already heard from some of you who sold GBP/JPY short after reading last week's column, and while I appreciate all of your kind comments and praise, I want you to know that you deserve all of the credit – congratulations! Whenever we take a trade, the credit or the blame always goes to the person who hit the button or clicked the mouse. Trading is not a good business for those who do not take responsibility for their own actions, but it's a great business if you have the ability to stand up and admit when you're wrong – and there is nothing wrong with taking credit when you're right. If you hit the button, then you deserve the credit for those times when you win, just as you deserve the blame for those times when you lose.
More Ammo for GBP Bears
In the Forex market, there is a clear connection between technical and fundamental analysis that does not exist in the stock market. The technical weakness in GBP/JPY that was indicated on the charts is backed by fundamental information. At the same time that the chart was breaking down, the OECD released its predictions for growth in the third and fourth quarters of 2008. The OECD is the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which describes itself as an "international organization helping governments tackle the economic, social and governance challenges of a globalised economy". Interestingly, they picked Japan to have the strongest growth of any G7 country, while predicting a recession for the United Kingdom. The U.K. was the only G7 country to receive that distinction (see figure 2).
Figure 2: OECD projections for Q3 and Q4 growth in the G7 countries. Source: OECD
Under these circumstances, it shouldn't be too surprising that the Yen has the British Pound on its heels, and one could say that the Yen is fundamentally - and technically - stronger than the Pound. Even if the OECD's predictions turn out to be inaccurate, they are a respected organization and their opinion carries some heavy weight. For more on the OECD, visit their website at http://www.oecd.org.
Question of the Week
Q) I'm just trying to figure out what you mean when you say it's wrong to make money off a natural disaster. If I trade for a living, then am I supposed to ignore a pending natural disaster? Am I supposed to take a few days off of trading (or a few weeks) until the threat of the natural disaster has passed? What if I was long the dollar when I heard about the hurricane, would it be would wrong and unethical to change my opinion and close my positions out due to that news? If I trade professionally, and I don't, then I would be a fool to ignore any information that could change my opinion or the markets opinion and help me make money.
Just for the record I never considered shorting or buying the dollar based on the hurricane because I don't see the correlation in this particular case.
But I think your statements about whether people try and trade this news or not were insulting and ignorant. Nobody is making money off the misfortunes of others. They are making money off of other market participants. It's a shame that natural disasters, and human caused disasters happen in the first place...but they do. And to ignore the potential consequences those disasters may have on a market would be totally and undeniably idiotic...and a recipe for disaster.
Ed Ponsi) Thank you for your question and comments. Maybe I'm being old fashioned here, but I think it's wrong to bet on Death, Destruction, and Disease to win, place, and show. I'm sorry to hear that you find my stance "insulting and ignorant" as you put it, but I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. In my years as a Wall Street trader, my employer frowned upon such "disaster trading". He didn't want to hear his traders cheering as the body count rose, so I guess he was old fashioned, too.
I certainly never said that anyone should stop trading due to a pending natural disaster, or that anyone should ignore the consequences of such a disaster. That would be foolish. But that is very different from trying to profit from an anticipated disaster. For example, if you are short the USD due to technical or fundamental reasons and an earthquake occurs in the US, you were not trying to game the disaster. In this example, it's possible that you may have benefitted from a natural disaster, but that wasn't the specific intent. That would be very different from placing trades that were specifically designed to profit from an earthquake. There is a huge difference between those two things; one is passive, and one is active.
I'd like you hear from our readers on this one; what do you think? Is it wrong to create trades that are specifically designed to profit from disasters, natural or otherwise? Or as traders, is it just our job to place the trades and ring the register, regardless of the circumstances? Let me hear your opinions.
Have a question about Forex trading? Send an email to eponsi@tradingacademy.com and we may use your question in an upcoming newsletter. Until next time, best of luck to you in trading.
|
|
Ed Ponsi is a globally recognized name as a lecturer and teacher and is the former Chief Trading Instructor for Forex Capital Markets. An experienced professional trader and money manager, Ed has advised hedge funds, institutional traders, and individuals of all levels of skill and experience. Ed has appeared on CNBC, CNN International and TheStreet.com, and has recently written his first book for Wiley Finance, "Forex Patterns and Probabilities" (which you can purchase through 